h4x3d.com

- h4x3d.com

Archive
Tag "usa"

Recorded live from CNN, includes some bits in addition to speech.
I am quite sure there will be better and cleaner version out there soon, but for now, enjoy this free mp3.

Obama Speech (starts around 1:30)
United States National Anthem

With Obama being the new president of the USA I have just dug out my USA flag…

Did you check out the new http://www.whitehouse.gov ?
They put it up five minutes before he was even sworn in, how nice!

From mashable.com:

Facebook and CNN have released numbers for their live streaming partnership today, which allowed Facebook users to provide live commentary on the CNN feed.

The stats released, as of noon ET:

1. There were 200,000+ status updates through the Facebook integration on CNN.com

2. at that time, 3,000 people commented on the Facebook CNN feed per minute

3. Obama’s Facebook Fan Page has more than 4 million fans and in excess of 500,000 wall posts

As of 11.45am, CNN:
-had served 13.9 million live video streams globally since 6am
-had broken its all time total daily streaming record (from Election Day) of 5.3 million live streams.

Probably why I had to que to view the video.
Firefox screwed around asking for some additional plugin to be installed, while safari just took me directly to the video/facebook stream.

Read More

Obama made it – the democratic party pretty much wiped the republicans this election. Young and new voters played a massive role this election (18% total voters between 18 and 29), as 66% voted for Obama.

ishot-81

ishot-74

Now I get to change my site back to “normal” once more and release my updated h4x3d.com theme this week.
Also, running WordPress 2.7 nightly right-now (looks and feels good). Working on trac for support tickets, but it is a pain in the …

Read More

american dad
One Little Word
When Stan becomes his boss’ go-to guy, he feels like he can’t say no to anything including outrageous personal requests. But when Francine gets roped into the annoying ordeal and her romantic Valentine’s Day get-away is ruined, she lays down the law and forces Stan to say “NO”.

Download American Dad S04E03 – One Little Word via Rapidshare.com

http://rapidshare.com/files/155890198/ad.403.rar

not my link

Read More

The third and final Presidential Debate between Obama and McCain (15th of October – 15/10/2008)
Senators John McCain and Barack Obama went head-to-head on health care, the Supreme Court and the economy in their final debate before the November 4 election.

Available as MP4/FLV 200MB download, full 1GB version (both 90 minutes) available via Rapidshare.com.

Download Third 2008 Presidential Debate 3 via Rapidshare.com

http://rapidshare.com/files/154652105/Third.Presidential.Debate.US.10.15.2008.flv

http://rapidshare.com/files/154661158/Third.Presidential.Debate.10.15.2008.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/154662335/Third.Presidential.Debate.10.15.2008.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/154669120/Third.Presidential.Debate.10.15.2008.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/154671415/Third.Presidential.Debate.10.15.2008.part4.rar

The avi highquality version will be available shortly.

Go Obama!

Read More

Obama and McCain take it on in the second US Presidential Debate with only few days left.
Download the 2nd US Debate below from Rapidshare.com

http://rapidshare.com/files/152475627/2008.us.presidential.debate.2.ws.pdtv.xvid-nosegment.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/152475631/2008.us.presidential.debate.2.ws.pdtv.xvid-nosegment.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/152496350/2008.us.presidential.debate.2.ws.pdtv.xvid-nosegment.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/152780086/2008.us.presidential.debate.2.ws.pdtv.xvid-nosegment.part4.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/152764540/2008.us.presidential.debate.2.ws.pdtv.xvid-nosegment.part5.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/152764543/2008.us.presidential.debate.2.ws.pdtv.xvid-nosegment.part6.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/152771009/2008.us.presidential.debate.2.ws.pdtv.xvid-nosegment.part7.rar

Read More

-4- USA IS UNDER ATTACK (9/11)
4.1 Summary of facts as given by the “official media”

This chapter was written to point out, that the information the average viewer was able to get, was very limited. All major news companies, such as CNN, CBS, FOX NEWS and even BBC (Europe) broadcasted the same information.
Even the video coverage was identical for at least 3-4 days after the attacks.
Here is a compact version of the events that took place on 9/11 with information from the mentioned news companies:22 This gives the impression of a carefully orchestrated campaign.

8:45 a.m. : A hijacked passenger jet, American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston en route to Massachusetts, crashes into the north tower of the World Trade Center and sets it on fire.
9:03 a.m.: Another hijacked plane, United Airlines Flight 175 from Boston, crashes into the south tower of the World Trade Center and explodes. Now both buildings are burning.
9:43 a.m.: American Airlines Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon.
10.05 a.m.: The south tower collapses and a huge wave of dust crawls through the streets.
10.10 a.m.: A part of the Pentagon collapses.
10:10 a.m.: United Airlines Flight 93, also hijacked, crashes in Pennsylvania, southeast of Pittsburgh.
10:28 a.m.: The World Trade Center’s north tower collapses.
4 p.m.: U.S. officials say there are “good indications” that Saudi militant Osama bin Laden is involved in the attacks, based on “new and specific” information developed since the attacks.

4.2 Summary of background information and facts which are not widely known

To better understand the complexity of the 9/11 attacks, it is important to look at these unmentioned facts, because the official version is not detailed enough:
Fighter planes that were patrolling the area and new fighters that were sent out to secure the airspace were all not flying at their full speed, therefore they couldn’t reach the hijacked planes to intercept them.24 Those F-15 and 16 fighters could easily have intercepted the second plane heading for the WTC and the flight 77 for the pentagon, as they were “flagged” hijacked several minutes after the first crash. (The Otis Air National Guard Base is located 188 miles from New York City. According to NORAD’s timeline, fighters left Otis 11 minutes earlier. If they were still 70 miles away, then they must have been travelling about 650 mph, when the top speed for an F-15 is 1875 mph!25)
Besides the fighters only flying at half their speed (According to Major Gen. Paul Weaver, director of the Air National Guard), they (the F-15 fighters) were not armed (no missiles on board), and not allowed to shoot down any civilian airplane, as only the president is allowed to give this special order. The consequence of this is that all four planes were able to arrive their final destination, as the fighters that were after them were useless. Hence Bush was not notified about the hijacked planes and the first impact at the WTC, he could not allow them to shoot them down. By the time of the attacks, Bush was staying in the Booker Elementary School, listening to a students’ performance. This is where the average TV watching citizens is asking himself why the president did not know what is going on. Instead of being carried away by secret service agents he remains there. Journalists describe his face as motionless afterwards. Bush later on says:
“And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower – the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, ‘There’s one terrible pilot.’ And I said, ‘It must have been a horrible accident.’ But I was whisked off there – I didn’t have much time to think about it.”
(Copied from the CNN article released on the 4th December 2001).
Bush has repeated this (obviously untrue) story on other occasions27. (For example in a town hall meeting with the people citizens of Ontario on the 5th January 2002)28. However, it has was said that Bush didn’t have access to a television until 15 minutes later. There for it was not only impossible for him to see it live, but also it was impossible to be shown on TV, because the first crash was not shown live on TV and the video of it was released on the next day’s evening. A Boston Herald article says,
“Think about that. Bush’s remark implies he saw the first plane hit the tower. But we all know that video of the first plane hitting did not surface until the next day.”29
This shows that Bush either has something to hide or that he knows something that he doesn’t want to share with the public. Either way this is suspicious.
Also, did you know that 3 of the 4 planes were flying with only a few passengers26, but that though they were only doing a national flight were filled to the max with gasoline?
Usually this is only done to overseas flights.
Flight 93 had only 38 people aboard; that is a quarter of what it is capable of.
The plane was filled with 11 000 gallons of jet full though – for technical reasons – it only needs half of it.
Knowing this fact it is now understandable why the WTC sustained so heavy damage.
Another curiosity: Did you know that five or even six of the 19 suspected hijackers are still alive and that they have nothing to do with the attacks on the WTC?30
“Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.”
- BBC31
He left the USA a year ago and now is a pilot for Saudi Arabian airlines based in Morocco.
Another man said he lost his passport in Denver, 1996. He continues to say, that he notified the police of the theft. At the moment he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms.
Again, this is an indication that information released by the FBI with help of the news companies is doubtful or even untrue.

Read More

- 3 – Mr. Bush

To fully understand the political context it is important to gain further knowledge about the man who is behind all this: Mr. Bush.

3.1 Who is this man?

George Walker Bush is the 43rd President of the United States. He was born on July 6, 1946 in New Haven, Connecticut. His father was the 41st President of the US, George Herbert Walker Bush. In 1959, George (from now on I am referring to the current president of the USA) was enrolled in the Kinkaid School near Houston, Texas, a private academy in one of the nation’s wealthiest suburbs. He did not stay there for very long, because 1961 his parents decided to enrol him at the Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts, the school his father went to.
“He was an average student who never made honour roll”, so says the school’s yearbook and a dean at Andover doubted that George would be good enough to be accepted at Yale University.0 Of course George wouldn’t break this tradition and went there, too. He received a bachelor’s degree from Yale University in 1968 and then served the military as a as an F-102 fighter pilot in the Texas Air National Guard.
“Bush had taken the Air Force Officers Qualification Test at Westover Air Force Base in Massachusetts, scoring only 25 percent on the “pilot aptitude” section (the lowest acceptable grade) and 50 percent for navigator aptitude. But he scored 95 percent on test questions designed to determine “officer quality.” There were a few Guard openings, and a waiting list of other applicants. Bush was given the last slot and was sworn in as an airman the same day he applied. “He was,” according to Los Angeles Times reporter Richard A. Serrano, “able to jump into the officer ranks without the exceptional credentials many other officer candidates possessed.” Indeed, while “Bush quickly won a place among the Guard’s elite fighter pilots, other young men who earned their wings first had to build up extensive military experience and aviation skills.”"
- Coincidently, his father was an influential congressional representative at the time.
During this time (America was fighting in the Vietnam War), applying for the National Guard was seen as a denial of military service, because the NG operates inside the US only.
In 1975, Bush received a Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Harvard Business School. He then returned to Texas and began his career in the oil business as a free-lance agent; he started working on behalf of different oil companies. Bush established his first oil company named “Arbusto” in 1977 (“Arbusto” is Spanish for “bush”) which soon after ended in ruin.
He graduated and then moved back to Texas to begin a career in the energy business. Usually you expect a career to be something special and good. In his case, it was only the first. His career in the oil business was shocking in a special way:
Molly Ivans, a journalist, describes his development like this:
“When you want to look at George W. [Bushs] development in the oil business, you have to visualize the following: He never created or even found a single source of income, if you don’t count at all the dollars that seeped into the texican underground.”
Until 1986, he earned his money from acting as a CEO6 of several companies. One of these companies was “Spectrum 7″.
“In 1986, Spectrum 7 merged with Dallas-based Harken Oil & Gas, which specialized in the purchase of small, insolvent companies. Its largest stockholder at the time (46.8 percent) was Hungarian-born billionaire George Soros, the international financier and currency speculator […]. Paul Rea, Spectrum 7’s president, told the Washington Post: “One of the reasons Harken was so interested in merging was because of George [Bush]. They believed having George’s name there would be a big help to them. They wanted him on their board.”"
He learnt that his name would open him doors, he never had thought of.
After his more or less “unsuccessful” career so far, he started supporting his dad’s presidential campaign, which turned out to be successful. And on the business side,
in 1989, a group formed by Bush Junior bought the Texas Rangers, a Major League Baseball team. He personally invested not more then $606,000. But when the team was sold some years thereafter, his shares were worth over $14.9 million – a tremendous gain made possible by using his fathers’ connections in the background. This is how Mr. Bush finally earned enough money to finance his election.
After 8 years experience in politics (governor of Texas) he was put up as republican presidential candidate, in the coming November he won the election by 271 to 267 electoral votes. He lost the official tally with 50,158,094 to 49,820,518 votes for Al Gore.7
In 2001, he officially started his presidency and took over Bill Clinton (a democrat) who beat his father in the 1992’s presidential election.

3.2 His business connections

Some of Bush’s connections to the Arabian states are known and transparent, but others are very well hidden and can only be discovered when looking at his personal background relations. The overall picture shows a striking evidence of close contacts to the bin Laden clan.
A series of coincidences starts in 1968 when George Bush meets and befriends with James Bath, a former Air force pilot and budding entrepreneur. This Mr. Bath functioned as a contact man between the Bush family and the Saudi Arabian Royals, and later on the Laden Clan. With the help of James Bath, these ties became closer and closer over the years. Salem bin Laden for example, Osama’s older brother, had a trust agreement with Bath whereby James would act as his representative for North America. From that point on money was invested in Bush’s business ventures. The business relations grew: In the early 90’s bin Mahfouz, the bin Laden clan’s and Saudi’ banker bought 20% of the BCCI.8

Globalresearch9 wrote:
“Could it, then, perhaps have been nothing more than a coincidence that a brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden, Khalid bin Mahfouz, was reported in the early 90′s to own a 20% stake in BCCI10 – and that bin Mahfouz, as reported by the Houston Chronicle on June 4, 1992, had intimate business dealings with James Bath, the personal representative of bin Laden brother Salim who had invested $50,000 in George W. Bush’s company, Arbusto? Bin Mahfouz, incidentally, had taken over Salim bin Laden’s interest in the Houston Gulf Airport after Salim met his demise in an airplane crash over Houston in 1988″11
Later, the Saudi Royal sheikh Abdellah Taha Bakhsh bought 17,6 % of Harken12 (Oil and energy related company from Houston, Texas where Bush worked) and therefore became the main shareholder. In their research “Outlaw Bank” Jonathan Beaty and S.C. Gwyne report ,that there were numerous other investments by Saudi Royals in Texas. Most of them were handled by the chambers of Baker&Botts, a company owned by James Baker, the man that did business with the bin Laden and Bush Clan. Based on this fact you can say, that there had been relations between the Bush’s and the Laden’s for a long time. Bush, when asked to comment on this said that those connections were no longer active. This is obviously not correct as the Carlyle Group (mentioned later on) still does business with them.
Another surprising fact was discovered by The Guerrilla News Network13, Their authors reportthat Bush Senior authorized several programs to upgrade Iraq’s military in order to support the war against Iran. After the first gulf war was over those relations did not break up at all. In 1991, the US military was “wondering” when fighting the gulf war one why the Iraqi soldiers had similar ammunition and arms. Thus you can say that the former Bush administration maintained and arranged business relations with the Iraq. This fact was well known to the other governmental facilities, but hence no one wanted to loose their position or get defaced no one dared to release the needed information to stop those relations.
But the Iraqi regime did not only receive military equipment.14
This is a widely known fact as well. I compiled a list with the help of different books that demonstrates how these dual-use technology deals worked.15
Last, but not least to mention the Carlyle Group, where Mr. James A. Baker, III, works (for more information see “3.3″). This multinational company earns over 5 billions Dollars a year and employs about 40.000 workers. Just to clarify what the Carlyle Group does I have attached several examples.16
This company is a global player and supplies numerous goods to the US military. At least 5 of their sub companies work on researching projects for the US military. Those include aero-technology (for fighter and transporter engines), missile technology (air to air and ground to air), fiber optic technology for use in military vehicles and combat wear, as well as software needed to operate those military devices. If there was a war going on, this company would have been among the number one firms to profit from it. Hence Bush Senior and other powerful men work for them, it is not too much of a surprise that the current Bush administration “play” an aggressive political style. Carlyle also works with the bin Laden Clan and the Saudi Royals. Together with the bin Laden Clan they built numerous huge and expensive buildings in Saudi Arabia.17
For example they were hired to rebuild the Khobar Towers in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, after the bombing on the 25th June 1996.18 This incident is very ironical due to the fact that US investigators blamed Osama bin Laden for this terrorist attack. (19 US soldiers died and 500 were wounded)19

3.3 His Personal connections:

George Bush’s father worked for the Carlyle Group after his presidency and had regular meetings with members of the Bin Laden Clan. It is a known fact, that the Bin Laden Clan had invested at least over two million dollars in Carlyle projects.20
Prince Bandar who is a member of the Saudi Royal Family and also the ambassador to the US is a close friend to the Bush family as well. Bush’s nickname for the Prince is “Bandar Bush”. (Robert Baer “Sleeping with the Devil” crown, 2003)
The prince and Mr. Bush are reported to be meeting on a regular basis to dine together, Bandar also took place in Barbara Bush’s 75th birthday celebrations.21
Ambassador Bandar even took George Bush Senior to England for a pheasants hunt. In conclusion you can say that their relation was very close.
Another common friend is James Baker, a lawyer working for both the Saudi Royal family and the Bush family, he is also employed at the Carlyle Group in Washington and served the Bush administration as Secretary of State just a decade ago. This man is another good example for the close personal and business ties.

Read More

The following article is part of a series called “German A-Levels/Abitur 2005 English LK”. In Germany you have your a-levels after the 13rd year in school. Pupils are usually between 17 and 18 years when they have their exams. In the compulsory schools you a broad variety of courses: From German, English, Spanish, French, Dutch, Greek to Science, Maths, Geographics, Physics, Literature, Arts and Sports etc. I prepared myself in 2005 for my a-levels by writing everything down. May these articles help anyone. Enjoy!

Coursework English LK

Topic: Bush’s war on terrorism
“How he used 9/11 to justify the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq”
Subject: English LK 12/2 Fr. Beer 2004
Author: Julian Klewes for h4x3d.com

cover_weapons_of_mass_destr.gif

“Suddenly the Weapons of Mass destruction become Weapons of Mass distraction”

Introduction:
I am writing my coursework about Bush’s war on terrorism because the actions that took place on and after the September 11th, 2001 (shortened to 9/11 in due course) influenced my life in many ways. Now I see the world with other eyes.
That day at 15.56 o’clock (8.56 AM US-Time) I received an instant message from one of my American mates saying, “NY is under attack”. I thought it was a joke and turned on my TV to watch the ongoing CNN live coverage. Just 5 minutes later, I saw the second plane, flight 175, hitting the south tower. The first few minutes I kept asking me the same two questions that now motivate me to write my coursework on this subject: Who would someone plan such a cruel and insane attack against innocent people? But also: Why should anyone use an airplane to strike the World Trade Centre? It did not make any sense; but now after having researched over four weeks I perhaps know some of the answers…

In the ongoing progress of reading through my work, you will find answers – the ugly but true reality about what had happened, and who profited from it.

Structure:
_______________________ -1- Cover
_______________________ -2- Introduction and structure
_______________________ -3- Mr. Bush
__________________________ 3.1 Who is this man?
__________________________ 3.2 His business connections
__________________________ 3.3 His personal connections
_______________________ -4- USA IS UNDER ATTACK (9/11)
__________________________ 4.1 Summary of facts as given by the “official media”
__________________________ 4.2 Summary of background information
_______________________ -5- The consequences of 9/11
__________________________ 5.1 “It was Bin Laden”
__________________________ 5.2 War in Afghanistan
__________________________ 5.3 Patriot Act
__________________________ 5.4 Homeland security
__________________________ 5.5 “Osama Bin Forgotten”
__________________________ 5.6 “Weapons of Mass distraction (WMD)”
_______________________ -6- Closing commentary
_______________________ -7- Eigenstaendigkeitserklaerung
_______________________ -8- Sources

Read More

Vielleicht bringt mein Kurzreferat ja dem ein oder anderem etwas-
vielleicht findet jemand diese Seite via google (wie soviele andere auch) und freut sich (praktisch keine Hausaufgaben mehr machen zu muessen -grin-), so here it is, geschrieben 2005, irgendwann vorm Abitur für Geschichte Zusatzkurs, nothing big, ein Kursreferat halt, basierend groeßtenteils auf meiner 21 Seiten FA in English Lk (to come).

Bereits wenige Stunden nach dem Attentat des 11.Septembers 2001 gab der handtierende Präsident George Bush bekannt, dass kein anderer als der Terrorist Osama Bin Laden (teilweise in der amerikanischen Presse auch geführt als Usama bin Laden) verantwortlich war für dieses “organisitorische Meisterwerk des Grauens”.
Bush rechtfertigte einen nach wenigen Wochen beginnenden Krieg in Afghanistan mit dem Fakt, dass die afghanische Talibanregierung eine Auslieferung Bin Ladens verweigerte. Bin Laden gilt als Führer des Terrornetzwerkes Al Qaida, welches sich nachdem 11.September als die Verantwortlichen ausgaben. Zwei Videobänder die von dem arabisch sprachigen Sender ‘Al jazeera’ gezeigt worden waren gelten als ?die ersten Erklärungen zum Krieg gegen den kaptialistischen Westen?. Bin Laden, der auf dem ersten dieses 10 minütigen Bandes gezeigt wird, spricht von einem großen Erfolg gegen die USA und warnt alle Länder sich auf die Seite dieser zu stellen.
Im Dezember 2001 fielen bereits die ersten 100000$ Bomben auf die 10$ Zelte in Afghanistan. Ein Krieg der gewissermaßen nicht viel Sinn machte und nur als Scheinkrieg im Rahmen einer massiven PR-Offensive für Bush geführt wurde.
Afghanistan besitzt ein Eisenbahnnetz von 30 Kilometern, nur eingeschränkte kommunikative Infrastrukturen (kein Mobiltelefonnetzwerk) und vorallem was Bush natürlich als einen der Bewegsgründe neben wir stoppen vor keinem Land, welches den internationalen Terrorismus unterstützt oder Terroristen beherbergt? -keine Demokratie .
Man hat Bin Laden bis heute nicht gefasst. Im Vergleich zum Irakkrieg waren “nur” 10000-25000 amerikanische Soldaten in Afghanistan und es gab kaum K?mpfe zwischen Talibananhängern und den amerikanischen GIs. Der Krieg wurde zum größten Teil aus der Luft und mit Hilfe von Distanzwaffen geführt.
Man könnte nun zynisch behaupten, dass aufgrund der erfolglosen Suche nach Bin Laden, Bush in Saddam Hussein und seinen nicht existierenden Massenvernichtungswaffen einen neuen Sündenbock gefunden hatte. Damit verbunden war, dass Saddam seitens der US- Regierung nun in Verbindung mit den Anschlag auf das World Trade Center gebracht wurde.
Eine Entwicklung, die keiner so wirklich verstehen kann. Selbst das amerikanische Volk nicht. Mit Hilfe massiver PR Kampagnen im amerikanischen Fernsehen (CNN/FOX, etc) wurde das Volk zu einer Zustimmung des Krieges überzeugt. (vor dieser PR-Offensive stimmten “nur” 47% einem Präventivkrieg gegen den Irak zu und nach ihr ganze 74%!)

In der Hierarchie der 27 meist gebrauchten Begründungen für den Krieg lagen die folgenden acht ganz vorn (die sogenannten. “Hauptgründe”):

1. Krieg gegen den internationalen Terrorismus,
2. Verhinderung der Weitergabe von Massenvernichtungswaffen,
3. mangelhafte oder fehlende Waffen-Inspektionen,
4. Beseitigung des Regimes von Saddam Hussein,
5. das schlichte Argument: “Saddam Hussein ist böse”,
6. Befreiung des irakischen Volkes,
7. Bruch von Vereinbarungen bzw. Versprechungen
8. Irak stelle eine Bedrohung dar (“imminent threat”). (siehe 2.)

Die zweitwichtigsten Begründungen für den Krieg waren (teilweise weder logisch noch sinnvoll):
? “Weil wir dazu in der Lage sind”,
? wir müssen die unerledigte Aufgabe (“unfinished business”) zu Ende bringen,
? der Irak müsse entwaffnet werden,
? Verbindung zu Al Qaida
? mehr Sicherheit für die Welt.

Die übrigen Begründungen bewegten sich auf folgenden Ebenen:
? Rache,
? Irak sei eine Bedrohung für die Region,
? “um der Geschichte Willen”,
? Bewahrung des Friedens,
? Irak bedrohe die Freiheit,
? Verpflichtung gegenüber den Kindern für eine sichere Welt zu sorgen,
? Vorteile für den Nahen Osten erzielen,
? Belebung der Wirtschaft,
? Irak als Beispiel für andere Länder (Iran/Syrien?!),
? weil Saddam Hussein die USA hasst
? die Verletzung des Völkerrechts durch den Irak.

Die acht zuerst genannten “Gründe” für den Krieg haben sich in allen drei Untersuchungsphasen als die wichtigsten herausgestellt. Viele von den übrigen “Gründen” tauchten irgendwann einmal auf und verschwanden auch wieder aus der Diskussion… warum ist eigentlich klar.

Weiterhin gab es folgende Behauptungen:
? Behauptung 1: Der Irak hat versucht Uran vom afrikanischen Staat Niger zu kaufen. – Der Bericht beruhte, laut der Atomenergieagentur IAEA, auf gefälschten Dokumenten.
? Behauptung 2: Der Irak besitzt bis zu 20 Scud-Raketen mit unerlaubter Reichweite. – Bisher wurde keine gefunden.
? Behauptung 3: Der Irak besitzt mobile Laboratorien zur Herstellung von biologischen Kampfstoffen. – Drei derartige Fahrzeuge wurden gefunden, es steht aber noch nicht zweifelsfrei fest, dass sie tatsächlich dem vermuteten Zweck dienten.
? Behauptung 4: Der Irak produziert weiterhin chemische und biologische Kampfstoffe. – Weder Senfgas noch Sarin, VX oder andere Giftstoffe wurden entdeckt.
? Behauptung 5: Der Irak beherbergt Al-Qaida-Kämpfer. – Kein Beweis dafür konnte erbracht werden.
Keine dieser Behauptungen oder Aussagen haben sich als wahr behauptet. ( d.h. Der Krieg war unbegründet!)

Vor einigen Tagen stand in der FAZ, dass nun ein OFFIZIELLER Bericht ergeben hätte, dass es wirklich keine Massenvernichtungswaffen im Irak gab.

Somit verringen sich Bushs Chancen auf eine Wiederwahl im November 2004, da seine Gründe für eine Invasion/Intervention im Irak sich beweisbar als Lügen entpuppten. Sein Präsidentschaftsgegner Kerry benutzt diese nun um seine eigene Position zu stärken und Bushs Glaubwürdigkeit anzuzweifeln.

Read More

israel

What has our world come to nowerdays?
It is now, that I begin to understand the complexity of world.
What the hack is Iran’s leader trying to accomplish by statements such as “We seriously need to wipe out Israel from maps”?
Not as if I’d personally care, but hey wait, isn’t that a bit offensive towards those Jews and whoever lives there?
From my point of view it is rather harsh.
Other countries object. Of course. I bed it is America (again) that will take action in order to protect the zionist country #1.
In other words: Iran is next, but only if the Bush administration and the right wing of conservative republicans get hold of the current affairs.
Affairs such as the CIA leak case. Why would a government or someone working for one of the mightiest countries ever give information about one of their agents to press? Doesn’t make sense on the first glimpse, but when digging deeper it does: The CIA agent’s husband, an ambassador stood up against the Bush administration sometime before the IRAQ war by saying that IRAQ did not attempt to obtain nuclear material in Niger (one of Africa?s states, hope I didn’t spell that wrong). Thus he objected to what America?s conquest of ruining Iraq?s reputation was trying to accomplish. In return, the US government leaked his wife?s agent status and thus ‘ruining her life’ (sort of I guess, seeing as she cannot work as a ‘secret’ agent anymore).

Some thousand miles to the east, back in Germany the political situation is still a mess. There is no stable coalition and therefore no stable government. Even weeks after the election it is still not sure who will fill which department slot. Now, at the end of october 2005, some politicians fully gave up on their work causing a national domino effect. From one day to another several high ranking personalities gave up. One of Germany?s major party, the social democrats substain a big loss as their head of affairs stepped down. What will happen now? Noone knows, but what we, the people, know is clear. It cannot continue like this. The gap between poor and rich is dramatically widening. The amount of poor people increases heavily. There are more and more intellectually challenged children and students. Anyhow, again lateshift has finished and I return back home to post this.

Read More